![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Jun. 1st, 2006
Harsher sentencing?
Jun. 1st, 2006 05:56 pmhttp://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3685914a10,00.html
Is it just me that thinks that's a ridiculously lenient sentence?
Fuck that.
$2200 for having 115, 000 kiddy porn files? That's disgusting. I can get a $400 fine simply for leaving my car parked on the road with no warrant of fitness or registration, regardless of whether i have access to off street parking or not. THat's close to a quarter of what he got.
"The judge said he accepted the type of pornography was pernicious, and otherwise reputable people could get addicted to it."
For fuck's sake, you can say the same thing about class A drugs, and you don't see someone on being brought up on heroine possession getting something as minimal as a $2000 fine.
Christ I'm angry.
But hahahahahaha, no name suppression.
Is it just me that thinks that's a ridiculously lenient sentence?
Fuck that.
$2200 for having 115, 000 kiddy porn files? That's disgusting. I can get a $400 fine simply for leaving my car parked on the road with no warrant of fitness or registration, regardless of whether i have access to off street parking or not. THat's close to a quarter of what he got.
"The judge said he accepted the type of pornography was pernicious, and otherwise reputable people could get addicted to it."
For fuck's sake, you can say the same thing about class A drugs, and you don't see someone on being brought up on heroine possession getting something as minimal as a $2000 fine.
Christ I'm angry.
But hahahahahaha, no name suppression.
